[governance] Google sets up 'right to be forgotten' form after EU ruling

[Kwasi Boakye-Akyeampong]

http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-27631001

Google has launched a service to allow Europeans to ask for personal data
to be removed from online search results.

The move comes after a landmark European Union court ruling earlier this
month, which gave people the "right to be forgotten".

Links to "irrelevant" and outdated data should be erased on request, it
said.

Google said it would assess each request and balance "privacy rights of the
individual with the public's right to know and distribute information".

"When evaluating your request, we will look at whether the results include
outdated information about you, as well as whether there's a public
interest in the information," Google says on the form which applicants must
fill in
<https://support.google.com/legal/contact/lr_eudpa?product=websearch>.
[image: line]
Case study - Brad from Derbyshire

*"The story was relating to an offence of drinking and driving. A criminal
conviction.*

*"But has it got any public interest that somebody was convicted of that
several years ago? I don't think so."*

'Google should forget me' <http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-27642792>
[image: line]

Google said it would look at information about "financial scams,
professional malpractice, criminal convictions, or public conduct of
government officials" while deciding on the request.

Earlier this month, the BBC learned that more than half of the requests
sent to Google from UK individuals involved convicted criminals.

This included a man convicted of possessing child abuse images who had also
asked for links to pages about his conviction to be wiped.
'Fraudulent requests'

Google said information would start to be removed from mid-June and any
results affected by the removal process would be flagged to searchers.

Decisions about data removal would be made by people rather than the
algorithms that govern almost every other part of Google's search system.

Disagreements about whether information should be removed or not will be
overseen by national data protection agencies.

Europe's data regulators are scheduled to meet on 3-4 June. The "right to
forget" will be discussed at that gathering and could result in a statement
about how those watchdogs will handle appeals.
[image: line]
Analysis - Rory Cellan-Jones

*"Much of the comment online has been deeply sceptical about the right to
be forgotten, particularly in the US where the First Amendment guaranteeing
free speech would make this kind of ruling impossible.*

*Some have pointed out that information won't be removed from google.com
<http://google.com>, just your local version of the search engine, while
others question the sheer practicality."*

Google agrees to forget <http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-27634746>
[image: line]

Information will only disappear from searches made in Europe. Queries piped
through its sites outside the region will still show the contested data.

On 13 May, the EU's court of justice ruled that links to "irrelevant" and
outdated data on search engines should be erased on request.

The case was brought by a Spanish man who complained that an auction notice
of his repossessed home, which appeared on Google's search results,
infringed his privacy.
Less innovation?

On Friday, Google said that EU citizens who want their private details
removed from the search engine will be able to do so by filling out an
online form.

However, they will need to provide links to the material they want removed,
their country of origin, and a reason for their request.

Individuals will also have to attach a valid photo identity.

"Google often receives fraudulent removal requests from people
impersonating others, trying to harm competitors, or improperly seeking to
suppress legal information," the firm said.

"To prevent this kind of abuse, we need to verify identity."

However, in an interview given to the Financial Times
<http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/b827b658-e708-11e3-88be-00144feabdc0.html#axzz332EriqfM>,
Google boss Larry Page said that although the firm would comply with the
ruling, it could damage innovation.

He also said the regulation would give cheer to repressive regimes.

Mr Page said he regretted not being "more involved in a real debate" about
privacy in Europe, and that the company would now try to "be more European".

But, he warned, "as we regulate the internet, I think we're not going to
see the kind of innovation we've seen".

Mr Page added that the ruling would encourage "other governments that
aren't as forward and progressive as Europe to do bad things".
[image: line]
[image: European Court of Justice, Luxembourg]

People keen to get data removed from Google's index must:

   - Provide weblinks to the relevant material
   - Name their home country
   - Explain why the links should be removed
   - Supply photo ID to help Google guard against fraudulent applications

[image: line break]

-- 
*We should be taught not to wait for inspiration to start a thing. Action
always generates inspiration. Inspiration seldom generates action. *-- *Frank
Tibolt*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20140530/af4296ae/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t