Trivial to implement "to be forgotten" (was: Re: [governance] [IP] On Monday EPIC Freedom Awards to Allen, Amash, The Guardian, Snowden + Google right to be forgotten link

Lee W McKnight lmcknigh at syr.edu
Fri May 30 18:56:46 EDT 2014


First, if nominated, I will decline to serve.

Second, I believe the EU 'forgetting' procedures will only permit/enable take-down requests by EU citizens to be mandatorily reviewed by Google.

But...since the final procedures are not yet defined/announced, who knows what they will precisely cover....maybe the (alleged) fact some of my ancestors were alleged cattle rustlers/smugglers along the England/Scotland border some centuries ago would mean I might be covered...to your point of how far back in time things must be forgotten.  Oops, I probably shouldn't have mentioned that. To any journalists lurking, no pictures please. ; )

Lee





________________________________________
From: John Curran <jcurran at istaff.org>
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 12:53 PM
To: Lee W McKnight
Cc: <governance at lists.igcaucus.org>
Subject: Trivial to implement "to be forgotten" (was: Re: [governance] [IP] On Monday EPIC Freedom Awards to Allen, Amash, The Guardian, Snowden + Google right to be forgotten link

On May 30, 2014, at 12:19 PM, Lee W McKnight <lmcknigh at syr.edu> wrote:

> FYI re EPIC Freedom Awards to Allen, Amash, The Guardian, Snowden, below.
>
> Coincidentally coming same day as Google acquiescience to EU mandates on privacy right to be forgotten; which Google belatedly admits is trivial for it to implement - makes today a very good day for Internet Rights and Principles. In fact it is up already at: https://support.google.com/legal/contact/lr_eudpa?product=websearch      Lest you EU netizens - forget where to look for the form. ; )

<chuckle>

Presumably, Google will keep an archive of all of the "forgotten" links
somewhere, so that they may be promptly reinstated should they suddenly
become relevant?  e.g.  Lee McKnight decides to run for public office;
is there a form to ask for reinstatement of the omitted link information,
given that it is now relevant?  Or somehow allow inclusion in the public
results after the indexing of the public information on the next pass?
When does the individual lose the right to be forgotten due to presence
in public life, how do journalists know the appropriate guidelines and
process to be followed in such contexts so that they may fulfill their
duties to the public?

/John

Disclaimer:  My views alone.


-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t


More information about the Governance mailing list