[governance] Fwd: [igf_members] MAG Renewal

[Andrea Glorioso]

Dear David,

On May 15, 2013 6:18 PM, "David Cake" <dave at difference.com.au> wrote:
>
>
> On 15/05/2013, at 7:05 AM, Roland Perry <roland at internetpolicyagency.com>
wrote:
> >
> > Of course, one way that governments can participate in ICANN, other
than by sending people to the GAC, is by sending their technical people to
some of the other silos. (They could send GAC-type people to other silos
too, but it seems they can usually only justify the trip by having a whole
silo of their own, and I fully understand the dynamic of that).
>
>         Government participation in ICANN would be a lot more functional
if they did not feel the need to limit it to within GAC processes.

Could you elaborate on this? (Perhaps starting from who is the "they")

Thanks,

Andrea
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20130515/c8bc4fa7/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t