[governance] new gTLDs

[McTim]

On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Dominique Lacroix <dl at panamo.eu> wrote:

>  Le 18/08/12 04:59, McTim a écrit :
>
> Would you serve a greater public interest by denying orgs the ability to
> apply for the name they want because they may be large/corporate/rich/US
> orgs?
>
> Worldwide public interest in an unbalanced world!
> If you *really* want to internationalize, it could/should be ruled for
> instance:
>
> *"Each applicant / technical operator can submit for 10 TLDs max."*
>
> I was told that we can obtain change if we ask for it. So it is still
> possible. Let's just talk...
>


The rules are made now, you want to change them after ppl have invested?
 Good Luck with that!

FWIW, I was never a big fan of new gTLDs, but we have what we have after
many years of rule making.


-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route
indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20120818/9bda2f77/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t