[governance] new gTLDs

[c.a.]

So, what would you have then against Verisign?

Sent from a tablet

On 17/08/2012, at 23:59, McTim <dogwallah at gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Carlos A. Afonso <ca at cafonso.ca> wrote:
> I assume McTim has already analyzed ownership relations of all domain
> name proponents?
> 
> You are mixing apples and oranges.  I identified the public interest being served by allowing more gTLDs.
> 
> 
> 
>  
> I would not dare to assume anything before doing this.
> In my view as far as I can see (who "owns", who operates etc), the big
> domain companies will keep most of the pie.
> 
> 
> Would you serve a greater public interest by denying orgs the ability to apply for the name they want because they may be large/corporate/rich/US orgs?
> 
>  
> -- 
> Cheers,
> 
> McTim
> "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20120818/5734a23e/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t