[governance] Criterion for charter voting
parminder
parminder at itforchange.net
Wed Sep 29 13:10:25 EDT 2010
Yes, Izumi, I completely agree that the problems, if there are any,
associated with the charter amendment part of the process should not be
allowed to interfere with, and shadow over, the more important part on
voting in our new co-coordinator.
The voting for the new co-coordinator should go on and all should
participate enthusiastically, because, whatever gets decided, this is
how we show our continued commitment to the the IGC, and its relevance
to the changes in the world that we want to see, and possibly help bring
about...
Parminder
On Wednesday 29 September 2010 10:27 PM, Izumi AIZU wrote:
> Dear Parminder and all,
>
> Thank you for raising this important issue and providing inputs.
>
> Though I have my own opinion, being a candidate for a co-coordinator,
> I like to refrain from putting them here now, and like to follow whatever
> outcome we reach.
>
> I am afraid that my saying something on charter amendment
> may affect on the co-coordinator election or vice versa in an
> inappropriate manner.
>
> This might be the case of "Race condition"Avri put.
> Thank you for your understanding and continuing efforts,
>
> izumi
>
>
> 2010/9/30 Fearghas McKay<fm-lists at st-kilda.org>:
>
>> But the election has not completed so for new voters you haven't voted in
>> the last election, only the current running one.
>>
>> The whole election process was meant to be reviewed but it didn't seem to
>> make it to the top of our todo lists. I think it does need to be revisited
>> soon both for some version of Proportional Representation and procedural
>> tightening up.
>> f
>>
>> On 29 Sep 2010, at 14:32, Ginger Paque<gpaque at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I don't know if I should weigh in, being co-coordinator, but not running the
>> election, but this is exactly what I think: first I voted in the election,
>> then I voted on the charter.
>>
>> On 9/29/2010 8:28 AM, Avri Doria wrote:
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>> governance at lists.cpsr.org
>> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>> governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>>
>> For all list information and functions, see:
>> http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>>
>> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>>
>>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20100929/c49f3852/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
For all list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
More information about the Governance
mailing list