<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body text="#000066" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">Yes, Izumi, I completely
agree that the problems, if there are any, associated with the charter
amendment part of the process should not be allowed to interfere with,
and shadow over, the more important part on voting in our new
co-coordinator. </font><br>
<br>
The voting for the new co-coordinator should go on and all should
participate enthusiastically, because, whatever gets decided, this is
how we show our continued commitment to the the IGC, and its relevance
to the changes in the world that we want to see, and possibly help
bring about...<br>
<br>
Parminder <br>
<br>
On Wednesday 29 September 2010 10:27 PM, Izumi AIZU wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:AANLkTinyLXxHrn2H8Vx23-owo4Ge=4+QOPPy9kGgcwUQ@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Dear Parminder and all,
Thank you for raising this important issue and providing inputs.
Though I have my own opinion, being a candidate for a co-coordinator,
I like to refrain from putting them here now, and like to follow whatever
outcome we reach.
I am afraid that my saying something on charter amendment
may affect on the co-coordinator election or vice versa in an
inappropriate manner.
This might be the case of "Race condition"Avri put.
Thank you for your understanding and continuing efforts,
izumi
2010/9/30 Fearghas McKay <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:fm-lists@st-kilda.org"><fm-lists@st-kilda.org></a>:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">But the election has not completed so for new voters you haven't voted in
the last election, only the current running one.
The whole election process was meant to be reviewed but it didn't seem to
make it to the top of our todo lists. I think it does need to be revisited
soon both for some version of Proportional Representation and procedural
tightening up.
f
On 29 Sep 2010, at 14:32, Ginger Paque <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:gpaque@gmail.com"><gpaque@gmail.com></a> wrote:
I don't know if I should weigh in, being co-coordinator, but not running the
election, but this is exactly what I think: first I voted in the election,
then I voted on the charter.
On 9/29/2010 8:28 AM, Avri Doria wrote:
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a>
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org">governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org</a>
For all list information and functions, see:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance">http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance</a>
Translate this email: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://translate.google.com/translate_t">http://translate.google.com/translate_t</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>