[governance] FINAL? DRAFT statement on enhanced cooperation
parminder
parminder at itforchange.net
Thu Nov 11 11:03:40 EST 2010
Jeremy
I suggest we remove all the (4) options in our draft statement vis a vis
institutional developments under the Enhanced Cooperation rubric
(because I dont see how we can recommend that such new institutional
development is optional) and put in which to me is a very fair and
specific recommendation
The IGC strongly recommends that the existing institutional
framework within the OECD (we can name the Information, Computer and
Communication Policy Committee) (and also CoE?) designed to help
develop Internet public policies be taken as a model and similar
institutional framework be developed for globally applicable
Internet related public policies (Tunis Agenda) under the UN, with
participation of all countries and stakeholders. This new 'body'
will examine all critical Internet policy related areas, develop
policy frameworks, give detailed policy recommendations, and help
negotiate treaties etc in different areas of Internet policies.
What is good for the OECD must certainly be good for the whole world.
A very large number of the people discussing this issue on the IGC list
are engaged with this OECD institutional framework, therefore I cannot
see why this new proposal for inclusion in the draft should not be
acceptable to them .
Parminder
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20101111/faa93a5a/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
For all list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
More information about the Governance
mailing list