[governance] JPA response - second draft for comments

[Carlos Afonso]

Certainly, Ian.

--c.a.

Ian Peter wrote:
> Hi Anriette,
> 
> I still believe that the JPA can be ended, subject to ICANN agreeing to
> certain binding conditions. That I think is a far preferable arrangement if
> it can happen.
> 
> Ian Peter
> 
> 
> On 29/05/09 5:36 PM, "Anriette Esterhuysen" <anriette at apc.org> wrote:
> 
>> McTim.. that is exactly the question:
>>> between ICANN and ????
>>>
>> It is because of those ???? that some of us believe that a temporary
>> extension of the JPA is needed - merely until the ???? can be replaced
>> with something relatively tangible and accessible.
>>
>> Anriette
> 
> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>      governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
> 
> For all list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
> 
> 

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance