[governance] JPA response - second draft for comments

[William Drake]

Hi Ian,

On May 29, 2009, at 10:35 AM, Ian Peter wrote:

> Hi Anriette,
>
> I still believe that the JPA can be ended, subject to ICANN agreeing  
> to
> certain binding conditions. That I think is a far preferable  
> arrangement if
> it can happen.

Among whom would the binding conditions be agreed?  In what form?  How  
would their implementation be monitored and assessed?  What  
consequences would flow from failure to implement?  And so on...we're  
not going to get consensus on a statement that's based on abstractions  
and leaps of faith.  What's really needed is some serious  
brainstorming on 3.0 architectural options that are responsive to what  
goes on within the organization and to the growing intergovernmental  
machinations outside of it (witness this week's CSTD meeting etc).   
Can we do this before June 8?

Bill

  
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance