[governance] JPA response - second draft for comments
Ian Peter
ian.peter at ianpeter.com
Fri May 29 04:35:49 EDT 2009
Hi Anriette,
I still believe that the JPA can be ended, subject to ICANN agreeing to
certain binding conditions. That I think is a far preferable arrangement if
it can happen.
Ian Peter
On 29/05/09 5:36 PM, "Anriette Esterhuysen" <anriette at apc.org> wrote:
> McTim.. that is exactly the question:
>>
>> between ICANN and ????
>>
>
> It is because of those ???? that some of us believe that a temporary
> extension of the JPA is needed - merely until the ???? can be replaced
> with something relatively tangible and accessible.
>
> Anriette
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
For all list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
More information about the Governance
mailing list