[governance] JPA response - second draft for comments

Ian Peter ian.peter at ianpeter.com
Fri May 29 04:35:49 EDT 2009


Hi Anriette,

I still believe that the JPA can be ended, subject to ICANN agreeing to
certain binding conditions. That I think is a far preferable arrangement if
it can happen.

Ian Peter


On 29/05/09 5:36 PM, "Anriette Esterhuysen" <anriette at apc.org> wrote:

> McTim.. that is exactly the question:
>> 
>> between ICANN and ????
>> 
> 
> It is because of those ???? that some of us believe that a temporary
> extension of the JPA is needed - merely until the ???? can be replaced
> with something relatively tangible and accessible.
> 
> Anriette


____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance



More information about the Governance mailing list