[Fwd: [governance] Workshop proposal - Internationalisation of
Parminder
parminder at itforchange.net
Tue Apr 21 03:51:43 EDT 2009
I personally have no problem with putting it as Internationalisation/
transnationalisation
something like "
*Internationalization/ transnationalisation of Internet Governance - The way forward from
where we stand today *
I know this is last minute, and it is entirely up to the co-coordinators to take this change or not. But since Milton replied to my formulation I thought I should state my response/ position on it.
If not changed now, when we send the final formulation in May we can always do it this way.
parminder
Milton L Mueller wrote:
> I support the basic idea of both Workshops. However, can we use a term other than "internationalization" to describe Workshop 1? To many, "internationalization" means "takeover by existing intergovernmental organizations. Do we mean "transnationalization" or globalization" instead?
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Graciela Selaimen [mailto:graciela at rits.org.br]
>> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 10:05 AM
>> To: governance at lists.cpsr.org; Parminder
>> Subject: Re: [Fwd: [governance] Workshop proposal - Internationalisation
>> of
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I support the proposal of both workshops.
>>
>> best,
>> Graciela
>>
>> Parminder escreveu:
>>
>>> IGC-ers
>>>
>>> IGC has always taken lead in some key political issues at each IGF,
>>> and it will be rather amiss if we do not do. Moreover, it will not be
>>> the best outcome of all the energy and time we all devote here
>>> voluntarily for some public interest causes we believe it.
>>>
>>> I therefore seek views and endorsements for the two workshops that i
>>> think have a history in IGC's political engagements in global IG
>>> forums, especially the IGF. I am trying to push this at this late hour
>>> because I do believe ob both these subjects - Network Neutrality and
>>> Internationalisation of IG - there is a strong support in the IGC,
>>> which for some reasons have not clearly come out.
>>>
>>> So if you do want IGC to sponsor a workshop on these subjects pl
>>> indicate so in the next 24 hours, after which I will request the
>>> coordinators to take a call if enough support for these workshop has
>>> been forthcoming. While the text of the two workshop, at this stage
>>> of discussion, is posted below, we must remember that this is an
>>> initial rough proposal stage, and the final text can be changed to a
>>> considerable extent, within the overall stated subject framework,
>>> later, which we can do over some discussions. On the other hand, if we
>>> do not submit workshop proposals now they cannot be submitted ever for
>>> the IGF 4.
>>>
>>> I am only picking up these two workshops to especially advocate for
>>> them on my behalf within the IGC. Other workshop proposals that are
>>> moving forward will of course keep doing so, and coordinators may take
>>> a final decision tomorrow, though i ma not quite sure what the overall
>>> plan is.
>>>
>>> Thanks, parminder
>>>
>>> Workshop 1 -
>>>
>>> *Internationalization of Internet Governance - The way forward from
>>> where we stand today *
>>> The Internet's present governance structures grew out of certain
>>> historical contexts, as well as some new socio-political realities
>>> around the Internet. In the context of rapid changes that the
>>> Internet has wrought, the key and emerging issues related to its
>>> governance could not have been anticipated by anyone. One thing
>>> however is clear by now; the Internet is not just a technical
>>> artifact, requiring technical governance with regard to keeping it
>>> running smoothly, but a key socio-political phenomenon requiring
>>> participative, inclusive and accountable internationalization. It is
>>> important to analyze the needs of evolution and internationalization
>>> of IG from various standpoints and the direction in which we might
>>> move from here.
>>>
>>> The workshop will seek to discuss some real institutional
>>> possibilities of what to do next, possibly
>>> presenting and analyzing alternative models, along with the
>>> advantages and disadvantages of each.
>>>
>>>
>>> Relates to theme - IG, CIRs
>>>
>>>
>>> Who would you approach as co-organizers ? Or who do you think
>>> should organize it?
>>>
>>>
>>> IG Caucus would like to organize this workshop..
>>>
>>> It is important to analyze the needs of evolution and
>>> internationalization of IG from various standpoints and the direction
>>> in which we might move from here.
>>>
>>> The workshop will seek to discuss some real institutional
>>> possibilities of what to do next, possibly
>>> presenting and analyzing alternative models, along with the
>>> advantages and disadvantages of each.
>>>
>>>
>>> Relates to theme - IG, CIRs
>>>
>>>
>>> Who would you approach as co-organizers ? Or who do you think
>>> should organize it?
>>>
>>>
>>> IG Caucus would like to organize this workshop
>>> *
>>> Workshop 2*
>>>
>>> *Network Neutrality - Exploring a global consensus on principles*
>>>
>>> Concise description (up to 200 words)
>>> There is an increasing recognition of the urgency to develop some kind
>>> of NN principles in order to preserve the open and democratic nature
>>> of the Internet, and safeguard the interest of Internet users and
>>> others affected by it. This workshop will explore recent efforts to
>>> articulate and agree on NN principles in Europe, Japan, the U.S. and
>>> developing countries. While proceeding from numerous national
>>> regulatory developments, it will try to assess the transnational
>>> implications of various approaches to NN, especially vis a vis
>>> developing countries who seem largely absent from NN debates.
>>>
>>> Relates to theme -
>>> Openness
>>>
>>>
>>> Who would you approach as co-organizers ? or who do you think should
>>> organize it?
>>>
>>> Internet Governance Project (IGP) is happy to play a support role in
>>> organizing this. Others we would approach: Free Press (USA-based civil
>>> society advocacy group); Consumer Council of Norway; ITforChange
>>> (India-based civil society advocacy group), Japan Internet Providers
>>> Association and Ministry of Communications. There are other specific
>>> countries or examples that are involved in such negotiations over
>>> principles that we don't know about yet but will learn about later. We
>>> will seek out additional developing country commentators in particular.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Michael Gurstein wrote:
>>>
>>>> I would support this Workshop.
>>>>
>>>> MBG
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Ian Peter [mailto:ian.peter at ianpeter.com]
>>>> Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2009 3:45 PM
>>>> To: governance at lists.cpsr.org; 'Ian Peter'; 'Parminder'
>>>> Subject: RE: [Fwd: [governance] Workshop proposal -
>>>>
>> Internationalisation of
>>
>>>> At th is stage as we all seem to be occupied with other things I do not
>>>> believe IGC can endorse this workshop (unless there is a flood of
>>>>
>> support in
>>
>>>> next 48 hours and no opposition. Parminder, I would encourage you to
>>>>
>> submit
>>
>>>> it in any case.
>>>>
>>>> Ian Peter
>>>> PO Box 429
>>>> Bangalow NSW 2479
>>>> Australia
>>>> Tel (+614) 1966 7772 or (+612) 6687 0773
>>>> www.ianpeter.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Ian Peter [mailto:ian.peter at ianpeter.com]
>>>>> Sent: 18 April 2009 05:12
>>>>> To: governance at lists.cpsr.org; 'Parminder'
>>>>> Subject: RE: [Fwd: [governance] Workshop proposal -
>>>>> Internationalisation of
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Parminder. Any more comments on this? I thinkwe need
>>>>> expressions of support for the new wording from a few of
>>>>> those who were not happy with the previous version if we are
>>>>> to submit this as an IGC proposal
>>>>>
>>>>> Ian Peter
>>>>>
>>>>> PO Box 429
>>>>>
>>>>> Bangalow NSW 2479
>>>>>
>>>>> Australia
>>>>>
>>>>> Tel (+614) 1966 7772 or (+612) 6687 0773
>>>>>
>>>>> www.ianpeter.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>
>>>>> From: Parminder [mailto:parminder at itforchange.net]
>>>>> Sent: 18 April 2009 03:01
>>>>> To: 'governance at lists.cpsr.org'; Ian Peter
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Fwd: [governance] Workshop proposal -
>>>>> Internationalisation of
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I am fine with this. Just a technical language related point.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think we mean IG and not the Internet to be internationalised.
>>>>> Would therefore prefer
>>>>>
>>>>> "One thing however is clear by now; the Internet is not
>>>>> just a technical artifact, requiring technical governance
>>>>> with regard to keeping it running smoothly, but a key
>>>>> socio-political phenomenon requiring participative, inclusive
>>>>> and accountable internationalization."
>>>>>
>>>>> to be changed to
>>>>>
>>>>> "One thing however is clear by now; the Internet is not
>>>>> just a technical artifact, requiring technical governance
>>>>> with regard to keeping it running smoothly, but a key global
>>>>> socio-political phenomenon whose governance requires
>>>>> participative, inclusive and accountable internationalization. "
>>>>>
>>>>> parminder
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ian Peter wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Let me have one last go at this to see if we
>>>>> can get some acceptable wording . Please let me know if the
>>>>> following draft works, or possible amendments that might make
>>>>> it work. I'm trying to accommodate the range of interesting
>>>>> viewpoints we have on this subject
>>>>> - that is going to require removing some of the concepts
>>>>> which require further discussion or we will not reach agreement
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I've changed the original text quite liberally!
>>>>> Let me know if this works
>>>>>
>>>>> Title
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Internationalization of Internet Governance -
>>>>> The way forward from where we stand today
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Concise description (up to 200 words)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The Internet's present governance structures
>>>>> grew out of certain historical contexts, as well as some new
>>>>> socio-political realities around the Internet. In the context
>>>>> of rapid changes that the Internet has wrought, the key and
>>>>> emerging issues related to its governance could not have been
>>>>> anticipated by anyone. One thing however is clear by now; the
>>>>> Internet is not just a technical artifact, requiring
>>>>> technical governance with regard to keeping it running
>>>>> smoothly, but a key socio-political phenomenon requiring
>>>>> participative, inclusive and accountable
>>>>> internationalization. It is important to analyze the needs of
>>>>> evolution and internationalization of IG from various
>>>>> standpoints and the direction in which we might move from here
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The workshop will seek to discuss some real
>>>>> institutional possibilities of what to do next, possibly
>>>>> presenting and analyzing alternative models, along with the
>>>>> advantages and disadvantages of each.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Relates to theme - IG, CIRs
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Who would you approach as co-organizers ? Or
>>>>> who do you think should organize it?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> IG Caucus would like to organize this workshop..
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ian Peter
>>>>>
>>>>> PO Box 429
>>>>>
>>>>> Bangalow NSW 2479
>>>>>
>>>>> Australia
>>>>>
>>>>> Tel (+614) 1966 7772 or (+612) 6687 0773
>>>>>
>>>>> www.ianpeter.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>
>>>>> From: Parminder
>>>>> [mailto:parminder at itforchange.net]
>>>>> Sent: 13 April 2009 13:07
>>>>> To: 'governance at lists.cpsr.org'
>>>>> Subject: [Fwd: [governance] Workshop
>>>>> proposal - Internationalisation of IG
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This is an attempted draft for the
>>>>> proposed internationalisation workshop.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Title
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Democratic internationalization of
>>>>> Internet Governance - The way forward from where we stand today
>>>>> <!--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]-->
>>>>> <!--[endif]-->
>>>>>
>>>>> Concise description (up to 200 words)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> As the Internet becomes a key factor of
>>>>> reorganizing our social structures, and doing so at a global
>>>>> level as never before, democratic global governance of the
>>>>> Internet is a pressing imperative. Its present governance
>>>>> structures grew out of certain historical contexts, as well
>>>>> as of some new socio-political realities around the Internet.
>>>>> In the context of rapid changes that the Internet has
>>>>> wrought, the key and emerging issues related to its
>>>>> governance, and the correspondingly legitimate governance
>>>>> arrangements, could not have been anticipated by anyone. One
>>>>> thing however is clear by now; the Internet is not just a
>>>>> technical artifact, requiring technical governance with
>>>>> regard to keeping it running smoothly, but a key
>>>>> socio-political phenomenon requiring participative political
>>>>> governance by all people of the world, who are all
>>>>> implicated. However, the direction we move in from here
>>>>> depends on where we stand. It is important to analyze the
>>>>> needs of evolution and internationalization of IG from these
>>>>> dual standpoints.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The workshop will seek to discuss some
>>>>> real institutional possibilities of what to do next, possibly
>>>>> presenting and analyzing alternative models, along with the
>>>>> advantages and disadvantages of each.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Relates to theme - IG, CIRs
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Who would you approach as co-organizers
>>>>> ? Or who do you think should organize it?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It is best that this workshop is
>>>>> organized by civil society actors. IG Caucus will like to
>>>>> organize this workshop, along with some civil society
>>>>> organizations form the North and South that have shown interest.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Internal Virus Database is out of date.
>>>>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
>>>>> Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.11.31/2028 - Release
>>>>> Date: 3/28/2009 7:16 AM
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> ____________________________________________________________
>>>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>>> governance at lists.cpsr.org
>>>> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>>>> governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>>>>
>>>> For all list information and functions, see:
>>>> http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>>>>
>>>> ____________________________________________________________
>>>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>>> governance at lists.cpsr.org
>>>> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>>>> governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>>>>
>>>> For all list information and functions, see:
>>>> http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>> governance at lists.cpsr.org
>> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>> governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>>
>> For all list information and functions, see:
>> http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
> governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
> http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20090421/1b84edcb/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
For all list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
More information about the Governance
mailing list