[governance] Workshop Proposal - Towards a zero carbon Internet
Ian Peter
ian.peter at ianpeter.com
Sat Apr 18 18:33:57 EDT 2009
Please note I will not be submitting this as an IGC workshop at this stage
due to lack of interest
Ian Peter
PO Box 429
Bangalow NSW 2479
Australia
Tel (+614) 1966 7772 or (+612) 6687 0773
www.ianpeter.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ian Peter [mailto:ian.peter at ianpeter.com]
> Sent: 16 April 2009 05:55
> To: 'William Drake'; governance at lists.cpsr.org
> Subject: RE: [governance] Workshop Proposal - Towards a zero
> carbon Internet
>
> Bill, I was thinking more along the lines that probably well
> over 90% of the worlds connected computers are in large
> installations run by governments and corporations, and these
> may be responsible for about 10% of global carbon emissions.
> There is much that can be done if these groups co-operate in
> new ways. Also there were workshops which I found very
> disappointing on this in Hyderabad.
>
> But yes the governance issue is a little hard to find at this
> stage and I would certainly not like to see this as a main
> theme. However I think there is room for a few regional
> co-operative approaches, there are a few national legislation
> approaches, and definitely internet architecture approaches
> that should be examined here or elsewhere. I think these are
> aspects of governance in a loose sense. (and lets face it
> much internet "governance" is very loose)
>
> But right now with just a few days to go this does not appear
> to be something IGC is enthusisatic to support, and I am
> happy t acept that.
> Iwill give some thought to whether I submit this as an
> individual or not.
>
>
> Ian Peter
>
> PO Box 429
>
> Bangalow NSW 2479
>
> Australia
>
> Tel (+614) 1966 7772 or (+612) 6687 0773
>
> www.ianpeter.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: William Drake [mailto:william.drake at graduateinstitute.ch]
> Sent: 15 April 2009 19:32
> To: governance at lists.cpsr.org; Ian Peter
> Subject: Re: [governance] Workshop Proposal - Towards a
> zero carbon Internet
>
>
> Hi Ian,
>
> Could I ask you to clarify something. Last year when
> there were proposals to make climate change a main theme,
> some of us argued against it, both on the list and in the
> consultations (where Nitin agreed). Our concerns then were two-fold:
>
> First, while there are obviously links between
> Internet/ICT usage and CC, it wasn't clear what links were
> being postulated between IG per se and CC. Was the
> contention that existing mechanisms---say, the regulation of
> registries and registrars, IPV6, or WIPO/WTO regimes----have
> some discreet, identifiable impact that could be ameliorated?
> Or was it that a new mechanism, say a global regulatory
> agreement on the operation of server farms, should be established?
> There was some good research done but ultimately the linkages
> remained a bit undefined as a basis upon which to proceed.
>
> Second, some of us were concerned that the IGF
> shouldn't go off chasing UN hot topics (no pun intended) when
> so many questions about the actual institutional frameworks
> and conduct of IG per se had yet to be explored, or at least
> explored in any meaningful depth. IGF has generally looked
> more at "issues" than "institutions," and in many
> arenas---standards, cybercrime, IPR, e-commerce, etc
> etc---there's not been much focused discussion of whether the
> rule systems and decision making procedures in place are
> optimal, how they distribute benefits across stakeholder
> groupings, etc. Sticking with the original mission rather
> than diluting the focus has been a leitmotif of caucus and
> caucus member interventions over the years, for good reason.
>
> If we're going to reverse positions, what has changed
> since then to make this the best use of an IGC proposal slot
> (we can't have too many), especially when some IOs will
> probably make similar proposals again? Do you want to argue
> for a governance arrangement on energy usage? Or would the
> steps taken by various actors in their, uh, respective roles,
> to reduce emissions comprise something more like best practices etc?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bill
>
>
> On Apr 13, 2009, at 1:20 AM, Ian Peter wrote:
>
>
> Let me know what you think of IGC endorsement
> of a proposal along these lines, or any suggested changes. I
> appreciate this is a particular interest of mine and a way
> away from the normal business of IGC, but would be happy to
> see IGC involved if people feel that way.
>
>
> Title Towards a zero carbon Internet
>
> Concise description
>
> This workshop is to specifically explore the
> steps which can be taken by Internet users, but specifically
> by large private sector and governmental users, to
> substantially reduce greenhouse gas emissions associated with
> current internet usage patterns and architectures.
> Much investigation in this area has been
> undertaken and there are some fine private sector examples we
> can look at. There are also known actions which can be easily
> adopted which will be outlined during the workshop.
> Please note that this workshop should not be
> combined with workshops looking at measurement of IT
> greenhouse gas emissions to meet carbon trading scheme
> requirements. Important as those measures are, they result in
> an entirely different discussion involving a different set of
> stakeholders. This workshop is about what can be done
> immediately and work going on in the field at this time.
>
>
> Relates to theme -
>
> Critical Internet Resources
>
>
> If so, who would you approach as co-organizers
> ? If not, who do you think should organize it?
>
>
> We would seek to have involved represntatives
> of Google and VMWare, a representative of the Internet
> Architecture Board, a representative of CANARIE (Canada) who
> have a significant program in this area, IISD, APC and others.
>
> Ian Peter
>
> PO Box 429
>
> Bangalow NSW 2479
>
> Australia
>
> Tel (+614) 1966 7772 or (+612) 6687 0773
>
> www.ianpeter.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
> governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
> http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>
>
>
>
>
> ***********************************************************
> William J. Drake
> Senior Associate
> Centre for International Governance
> Graduate Institute of International and
> Development Studies
> Geneva, Switzerland
> william.drake at graduateinstitute.ch
> New book: Governing Global Electronic Networks,
> http://tinyurl.com/5mh9jj
> ***********************************************************
>
>
>
> Internal Virus Database is out of date.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.11.31/2028 - Release
> Date: 3/28/2009 7:16 AM
>
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
For all list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
More information about the Governance
mailing list