[bestbits] MAG 2018 Renewal criteria - inc geographic

[Nadira Alaraj]

Thanks Norbert,
No, I did know about the upper limit of each stakeholder. It is better
situated than earlier years but still leaves a maneuvering space based on
the stakeholder balances.


On Oct 19, 2017 2:04 PM, "Norbert Bollow" <nb at bollow.ch> wrote:

> On Thu, 19 Oct 2017 06:46:28 +0300
> Nadira Alaraj <nadira.araj at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Renata, Deborah and all,
> > From past experience the balance may not be of same number across
> > stakeholder group, particularly now with the intended decrease of MAG
> > members.
> > There is not a clear cut quota per each stakeholder.
>
> I agree that in the past it was not treated as a clear cut quota per
> stakeholder group.
>
> However I would also note that in the past they never posted any
> document comparable to
> https://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/content/mag-2018-renewal-0
>
> So maybe it will now be treated as a clear cut quota per
> stakeholder group. Or maybe not. I think we simply don't know.
>
> Greetings,
> Norbert
>
> Präsident | Digitale Gesellschaft | 4000 Basel | Switzerland
>
> --
> Die Digitale Gesellschaft setzt sich für unsere Freiheitsrechte
> in einer vernetzten Welt ein. Ja, http://digiges.ch/ichmachemit
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20171019/a3a419fc/attachment.htm>