[bestbits] Re: [discuss] [governance] Report from the BR meeting local organizing group - Dec 2013

[parminder]

This is some interesting congruence of views that is emerging..

Can we hope that that 'responsibility holders' among us - various 
committees, their heads, cocordinators of networks, our appointed 
Liaisons, etc come out with their views and stand on this issue.....

parminder

On Saturday 28 December 2013 10:40 PM, Louis Pouzin (well) wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 10:28 AM, William Drake <wjdrake at gmail.com 
> <mailto:wjdrake at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi
>
>     Thanks Parminder, glad we are able to agree on this.
>
>     [snip]
>
>
>     FWIW my view remains that if the networks involved refuse to work
>     through the 1net mechanism to channel nominations to the
>     Brazilians, they should not have taken positions on the 1net
>     coordination committee, which to date has one identifiable
>     function— channeling nominations to the Brazilians.   If the view
>     is that because its launch and initial expiation were not handled
>     well 1net therefore has no legitimacy as a channel, then the
>     networks shouldn’t lend it legitimacy and should resign from its
>     coordination committee.  I don’t share that view of 1net, but if
>     someone else does they should behave according to their principles
>     rather than trying to have it both ways.
>
> *+ 2
> *Louis
>
>     Best
>
>     Bill
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20131228/2b43e01b/attachment.htm>