<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <font face="Verdana">This is some interesting congruence of views
      that is emerging..<br>
      <br>
      Can we hope that that 'responsibility holders' among us - various
      committees, their heads, cocordinators of networks, our appointed
      Liaisons, etc come out with their views and stand on this
      issue..... <br>
      <br>
      parminder <br>
      <br>
    </font>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On Saturday 28 December 2013 10:40 PM,
      Louis Pouzin (well) wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CA+EjHYrXUsRpKQ_5rZkJvyKuJNXA0_jwKfPQKcDnvcogowRr_A@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div class="gmail_extra">
          <div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 10:28 AM,
            William Drake <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:wjdrake@gmail.com" target="_blank">wjdrake@gmail.com</a>></span>
            wrote:<br>
            <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
              .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
              <div style="word-wrap:break-word">Hi
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <div>Thanks Parminder, glad we are able to agree on
                  this.
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  <div>[snip]</div>
                </div>
              </div>
            </blockquote>
            <div> </div>
            <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
              .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
              <div style="word-wrap:break-word">
                <div><br>
                  <div>FWIW my view remains that if the networks
                    involved refuse to work through the 1net mechanism
                    to channel nominations to the Brazilians, they
                    should not have taken positions on the 1net
                    coordination committee, which to date has one
                    identifiable function— channeling nominations to the
                    Brazilians.   If the view is that because its launch
                    and initial expiation were not handled well 1net
                    therefore has no legitimacy as a channel, then the
                    networks shouldn’t lend it legitimacy and should
                    resign from its coordination committee.  I don’t
                    share that view of 1net, but if someone else does
                    they should behave according to their principles
                    rather than trying to have it both ways. </div>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </div>
            </blockquote>
            <div><b>+ 2<br>
              </b>Louis <br>
              <br>
            </div>
            <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
              .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
              <div style="word-wrap:break-word">
                <div>
                  <div>
                  </div>
                  <div>Best</div>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  <div>Bill</div>
                  <br>
                </div>
              </div>
            </blockquote>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>