[bestbits] Re: [discuss] [governance] Report from the BR meeting local organizing group - Dec 2013

[Louis Pouzin (well)]

On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 10:28 AM, William Drake <wjdrake at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi
>
> Thanks Parminder, glad we are able to agree on this.
>
> [snip]
>


>
> FWIW my view remains that if the networks involved refuse to work through
> the 1net mechanism to channel nominations to the Brazilians, they should
> not have taken positions on the 1net coordination committee, which to date
> has one identifiable function— channeling nominations to the Brazilians.
> If the view is that because its launch and initial expiation were not
> handled well 1net therefore has no legitimacy as a channel, then the
> networks shouldn’t lend it legitimacy and should resign from its
> coordination committee.  I don’t share that view of 1net, but if someone
> else does they should behave according to their principles rather than
> trying to have it both ways.
>
>
*+ 2*Louis

 Best
>
> Bill
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20131228/03479e03/attachment.htm>