[bestbits] Re: [discuss] [governance] Report from the BR meeting local organizing group - Dec 2013

[parminder]

On Saturday 28 December 2013 10:52 PM, parminder wrote:
> This is some interesting congruence of views that is emerging..
>
> Can we hope that that 'responsibility holders' among us - various 
> committees, their heads, cocordinators of networks, our appointed 
> Liaisons, etc come out with their views and stand on this issue.....

and yes, of course those selected through various processes for 1Net 
committees ....

>
> parminder
>
> On Saturday 28 December 2013 10:40 PM, Louis Pouzin (well) wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 10:28 AM, William Drake <wjdrake at gmail.com 
>> <mailto:wjdrake at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     Hi
>>
>>     Thanks Parminder, glad we are able to agree on this.
>>
>>     [snip]
>>
>>
>>     FWIW my view remains that if the networks involved refuse to work
>>     through the 1net mechanism to channel nominations to the
>>     Brazilians, they should not have taken positions on the 1net
>>     coordination committee, which to date has one identifiable
>>     function— channeling nominations to the Brazilians.   If the view
>>     is that because its launch and initial expiation were not handled
>>     well 1net therefore has no legitimacy as a channel, then the
>>     networks shouldn’t lend it legitimacy and should resign from its
>>     coordination committee.  I don’t share that view of 1net, but if
>>     someone else does they should behave according to their
>>     principles rather than trying to have it both ways.
>>
>> *+ 2
>> *Louis
>>
>>     Best
>>
>>     Bill
>>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20131228/c6c42c6d/attachment.htm>