<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On Saturday 28 December 2013 10:52 PM,
parminder wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:52BF08D1.2080404@itforchange.net" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<font face="Verdana">This is some interesting congruence of views
that is emerging..<br>
<br>
Can we hope that that 'responsibility holders' among us -
various committees, their heads, cocordinators of networks, our
appointed Liaisons, etc come out with their views and stand on
this issue..... <br>
</font></blockquote>
<br>
<font face="Verdana">and yes, of course those selected through
various processes for 1Net committees .... <br>
<br>
</font>
<blockquote cite="mid:52BF08D1.2080404@itforchange.net" type="cite"><font
face="Verdana"> <br>
parminder <br>
<br>
</font>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On Saturday 28 December 2013 10:40
PM, Louis Pouzin (well) wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CA+EjHYrXUsRpKQ_5rZkJvyKuJNXA0_jwKfPQKcDnvcogowRr_A@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 10:28 AM,
William Drake <span dir="ltr"><<a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:wjdrake@gmail.com"
target="_blank">wjdrake@gmail.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div style="word-wrap:break-word">Hi
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thanks Parminder, glad we are able to agree on
this.
<div><br>
</div>
<div>[snip]</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div> </div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div><br>
<div>FWIW my view remains that if the networks
involved refuse to work through the 1net mechanism
to channel nominations to the Brazilians, they
should not have taken positions on the 1net
coordination committee, which to date has one
identifiable function— channeling nominations to
the Brazilians. If the view is that because its
launch and initial expiation were not handled well
1net therefore has no legitimacy as a channel,
then the networks shouldn’t lend it legitimacy and
should resign from its coordination committee. I
don’t share that view of 1net, but if someone else
does they should behave according to their
principles rather than trying to have it both
ways. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><b>+ 2<br>
</b>Louis <br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div>
<div> </div>
<div>Best</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Bill</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>