[governance] Good examples of muiltistakeholder policy development at a national level?

[Ian Peter]

Thanks everyone who responded so far - I was interested to learn that we 
do have some reasonable examples of government co-operating with civil 
society and private sector in policy development: at a national level- 
and to learn that cgi.br is still alive.

We can debate forever what terms like "multistakeholderism", "enhanced 
co-operation", "respective roles" and "equal footing" mean, but I remain 
convinced that the only path to effective cooperation on the complex 
policy issues we face with the evolving internet will  be all parties 
working co-operatively on policy evolution - both within national 
borders, and also across these borders on a global basis.

I should mention that my questions were prompted by attending 
Australia's Netthing event (https://netthing.org.au/). My impression 
after that was that the government here wanted to be seen to be 
co-operating with other stakeholders, but either was doing this in a 
tokenistic fashion or wasn't quite sure how to go about it. So some good 
examples from elsewhere might be very useful!


Ian Peter

------ Original Message ------
From: "Tamir" <tisrael at cippic.ca>
To: governance at lists.riseup.net
Sent: 31/10/2019 3:56:02 AM
Subject: Re: [governance] Good examples of muiltistakeholder policy 
development at a national level?

>I can speak a bit to the Canadian IoT initiative.
>
>This process was largely guided/hosted by ISOC, CIRA (our ccTLD) and 
>ISED, which is our industry/innovation department. The process went 
>really well, and the government participants definitely engaged on 
>equal footing.
>
>There were also government officials, civil society reps and business 
>reps in the actual working groups that drove most of the work. There 
>too, it was definitely an equal footing exchange.
>
>Best regards,
>Tamir
>
>On 2019-10-30 12:51 p.m., Joly MacFie wrote:
>>The Canada IoT Security process, fostered by ISOC's NA Bureau, 
>>appeared to be a success https://iotsecurity2018.ca/
>>
>>Here is video of Larry Strickling's introductory comments 
>>https://livestream.com/internetsociety/12days08/
>>
>>Larry, incidentally, has left ISOC to work as Policy Director for US 
>>Presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg
>>
>>  joly
>>
>>On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 4:42 PM Ian Peter <ian.peter at ianpeter.com> 
>>wrote:
>>>I am interested to know of examples of nation states that might have 
>>>reasonable to good practices for involving civil society and the 
>>>private sector in internet related policy development, along the 
>>>lines perhaps of the ancient WSIS definition of "on an equal 
>>>footing".
>>>
>>>Is anyone doing this this other than in a token fashion? A few years 
>>>ago we had a good example with Brazil, but a change of government 
>>>changed that. What are our good examples now, or don't they exist?
>>>
>>>Ian
>>>---
>>>To unsubscribe: <mailto:igc-unsubscribe at lists.riseup.net>
>>>List help: <https://riseup.net/lists>
>>
>>
>>--
>>---------------------------------------------------------------
>>Joly MacFie  218 565 9365Skype:punkcast
>>--------------------------------------------------------------
>>-
>>
>>---
>>To unsubscribe: <mailto:igc-unsubscribe at lists.riseup.net> <mailto:igc-unsubscribe at lists.riseup.net>
>>List help: <https://riseup.net/lists> <https://riseup.net/lists>
>
>--
>
>Tamir Israel
>Staff Lawyer
>
>Samuelson-Glushko Canadian Internet Policy & Public Interest Clinic 
>(CIPPIC)
>University of Ottawa | Faculty of Law | CML Section
>57 Louis Pasteur Street
>Ottawa | ON | K1N 6N5
>☎: +1 613-562-5800 x 2914
>Fax: +1 613-562-5417
>PGP Key: 0x7F01E2C7 
><https://cippic.ca/documents/keys/tisrael@cippic.ca-pub.txt>
>PGP Fingerprint: 871C 31EC B6CC 3029 A1A1 14C4 D119 76EC 7F01 E2C7
>
>♺ Do you really need to print this email? / Est-ce nécessaire 
>d’imprimer ce courriel?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20191030/beb7f0a0/attachment.htm>