[governance] FW: [article] Did ISOC leave $1 billion on the table?

[Mueller, Milton L]

I think the analysis in this piece is rubbish.
It assumes e.g. a leveraged buyout using borrowed money.
But set that aside for the moment.

It is inconsistent to jump up and down and scream that the sale of .org constitutes a horrible commercialization of the internet, and then turn around and complain that ISOC didn’t get enough capital for it.
What exactly is our goal in raising a stink about this sale? Is just to make noise? Is it to get a higher price for ISOC? Or is it to get better protections for .ORG registrants? I hope it’s the latter.

Dr. Milton L Mueller
School of Public Policy
Georgia Institute of Technology
[IGP_logo_gold block_email sig]



From: governance-request at lists.riseup.net<mailto:governance-request at lists.riseup.net> <governance-request at lists.riseup.net<mailto:governance-request at lists.riseup.net>> On Behalf Of Ayden Férdeline
Sent: Monday, December 2, 2019 3:42 AM
To: governance <governance at lists.riseup.net<mailto:governance at lists.riseup.net>>
Subject: [governance] [article] Did ISOC leave $1 billion on the table?

A venture capitalist and ex-Mckinsey consultant offers some thoughts on the ISOC sale of PIR, and concludes that ISOC has undervalued PIR by about US $1 billion. This analysis is not perfect (it seems to conflate revenue with earnings) but is interesting nonetheless:

https://lancewiggs.com/2019/12/01/did-isoc-leave-1-billion-on-the-table/

Best wishes,
Ayden Férdeline
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20191202/204d18f7/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2870 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20191202/204d18f7/attachment.jpg>