[governance] Issues about ISOC and the public interest registries.

[Imran Ahmed Shah (via governance Mailing List)]

 Dear Deirdre,Very valid and important questions you asked.
ICANN Board (under the Chairmanship of Vent Cerf) accepted the higher bid of PIR/ISOC (founded by Vint Cert) giving a favor for steady income source. This one time income of $1.13b will be distributed and spend in very short time span, how the organization will be surviving after couple of years? Perhaps income generating through higher membership fee .....or otherwise, reducing its overall services and cutting down operational costs.
Best Regards
Imran Ahmed Shah. 

    On Monday, 2 December 2019, 21:04:33 GMT+5, Deirdre Williams <governance at lists.riseup.net> wrote:  
 
 
Dear Colleagues,
An issue that I haven't seen addressed is the issue of history and the reason why. Forgive me if it has been said already.
In the beginning ISOC was endowed with the public interest registries
a) to provide a steady income for ISOC to enable its work
And b) to ensure access for the public interest.
1.3 billion dollars sounds like a lot of money now, but 5 years from now? And 1.3 billion is a finite amount - it will finish.
In a way ISOC is a trustee holding an income producing asset. A trustee MIGHT consider selling such an asset to meet a very serious and urgent need on the part of its ward, or to invest in an alternative project better suited for revenue creation.
My questions for ISOC would be:
a) what is the urgent and serious need which forces the sale of this asset?
b) absent that, what is the alternative project which will guarantee the continuance of ISOC's income?
Best wishes
Deirdre
---
To unsubscribe: <mailto:igc-unsubscribe at lists.riseup.net>
List help: <https://riseup.net/lists>
  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20191202/29e982ae/attachment.htm>