[governance] [bestbits] US Support for Multistakeholder Governance is Conditional on US Remaining in Control

[Suresh Ramasubramanian]

The question here would be how or why he can speak for congress as a whole as opposed to current administration policy.

--srs

> On 20-Oct-2015, at 8:48 PM, Pranesh Prakash <pranesh at cis-india.org> wrote:
> 
>> On 20 October 2015 1:45:07 pm GMT+01:00, Suresh Ramasubramanian <suresh at hserus.net> wrote:
>> Come on, folks.  Asking a fairly ambiguous question, getting an equally
>> ambiguous answer and then making a mountain out of a molehill just to
>> score a point doesn’t sound like a very productive way to go.
> 
> Dear Suresh,
> Could you please point out the ambiguity in the questions and suggest how we could rephrase it to avoid that ambiguity the next time we ask it?  Thanks.
> 
> The question was:
> The technical stability of the DNS doesn't depend on the jurisdiction of ICANN.  Will the US Congress support a shift in jurisdiction?  And will there be a continued support for the multistakeholder model if the jurisdiction shifts?
> 
> The transcript for the meeting will be provided soon:
> https://meetings.icann.org/en/dublin54/schedule/tue-ncuc
> 
> Regards,
> Pranesh
> 

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t