[governance] [bestbits] US Support for Multistakeholder Governance is Conditional on US Remaining in Control

[Pranesh Prakash]

On 20 October 2015 1:45:07 pm GMT+01:00, Suresh Ramasubramanian 
<suresh at hserus.net> wrote:
>Come on, folks.  Asking a fairly ambiguous question, getting an equally
>ambiguous answer and then making a mountain out of a molehill just to
>score a point doesn’t sound like a very productive way to go.

Dear Suresh,
Could you please point out the ambiguity in the questions and suggest 
how we could rephrase it to avoid that ambiguity the next time we ask 
it?  Thanks.

The question was:
The technical stability of the DNS doesn't depend on the jurisdiction of 
ICANN.  Will the US Congress support a shift in jurisdiction?  And will 
there be a continued support for the multistakeholder model if the 
jurisdiction shifts?

The transcript for the meeting will be provided soon:
https://meetings.icann.org/en/dublin54/schedule/tue-ncuc

Regards,
Pranesh

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20151020/24eba1f9/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t