[governance] IANA transition - BR Gov comments on the CCWG-Accountability Draft Proposal

[Barry Shein]

From: Mawaki Chango <kichango at gmail.com>
>4) there remains another concern (which could have made it to my scenario
>#2). What happens when USG decides to put a country on some black list for
>some peculiar reason of its own which most of the nations-states disgree
>with or do not find necessary (and which might not even have anything to do
>with the Internet)? Wouldn't that country be shut off Californian courts
>for any legal recourse in Internet matters? If so, is that an acceptable
>state of affairs? What would be the remedy?

Would the recent lawsuits and judgements and continued actions (e.g.,
Haim et al v Islamic Republic of Iran, US Distr Court, DC) in US
courts serve as a counter-example to that concern?

   https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1494831416114150179&q=Haim+v.+Islamic+Republic+of+Iran&hl=en&as_sdt=20006&as_vis=1

or

  http://tinyurl.com/o3thbvb

-- 
        -Barry Shein

The World              | bzs at TheWorld.com           | http://www.TheWorld.com
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: 800-THE-WRLD        | Dial-Up: US, PR, Canada
Software Tool & Die    | Public Access Internet     | SINCE 1989     *oo*

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t