[bestbits] Re: [governance] Alternatives?
McTim
dogwallah at gmail.com
Fri Mar 7 00:37:45 EST 2014
I can't parse much of what you write below, but I will reply to the stuff I
can understand:
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Jean-Christophe Nothias <
jeanchristophe.nothias at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
Was IGF run according to some MSism model? Why is it then, that IGF
> produced very little or no concrete results or progress regarding Internet
> governance?
>
because it wasn't meant to produce concrete results.
> (what is it that was produced?)
>
greater understanding.
> Nota Bene: I like your understatement about the "highly questionable
> actors".
>
It was MG's language, not mine.
--
Cheers,
McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route
indicates how we get there." Jon Postel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20140307/d76b19b4/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
For all other list information and functions, see:
http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
http://www.igcaucus.org/
Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
More information about the Governance
mailing list