[governance] RE: [bestbits] Call for Transparency Process for 1Net

[Thomas Lowenhaupt]

+1

On 2/9/2014 5:16 PM, michael gurstein wrote:
>
> terposed and interposed itself between “CS” and the Brazil meeting, 
> make transparent its decision making processes including in the 
> crucial areas of financial supports and expenditures and decisions as 
> to inclusions and exclusions.  This is the absolute minimum that would 
> be expected from any public body or agency. And certainly it would 
> appear that many of the folks in this discussion not only are seeing 
> MS structures such as 1Net as supplemental public bodies, they are 
> seeing them as central public bodies in the Internet public policy space.
>
> Insisting that the responsible parties in 1Net spend the hour or two 
> required to provide a public accounting of their actions, resources 
> and procedures would provide an opportunity to clear the air and to 
> assure all and sundry that no elements of corporate or other capture 
> have been involved or are inserted into the structures that have been 
> provided for framing the on-going discussion. Or perhaps are those 
> opposing this absolutely minimum measure afraid of what might be revealed.
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20140209/0b071796/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t