<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#CCCCCC">
+1<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2/9/2014 5:16 PM, michael gurstein
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:044801cf25e4$9c395d10$d4ac1730$@gmail.com"
type="cite">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">terposed
and interposed itself between “CS” and the Brazil meeting,
make transparent its decision making processes including in
the crucial areas of financial supports and expenditures and
decisions as to inclusions and exclusions. This is the
absolute minimum that would be expected from any public body
or agency. And certainly it would appear that many of the
folks in this discussion not only are seeing MS structures
such as 1Net as supplemental public bodies, they are seeing
them as central public bodies in the Internet public policy
space.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Insisting
that the responsible parties in 1Net spend the hour or two
required to provide a public accounting of their actions,
resources and procedures would provide an opportunity to clear
the air and to assure all and sundry that no elements of
corporate or other capture have been involved or are inserted
into the structures that have been provided for framing the
on-going discussion. Or perhaps are those opposing this
absolutely minimum measure afraid of what might be revealed.</span></p>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>