[governance] DMP} Statement on Process and Objectives for the Global Multistakeholder Meeting on the Future of Internet Governance

[McTim]

On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Jean-Christophe NOTHIAS I The Global
Journal <jc.nothias at theglobaljournal.net> wrote:
<snip>



> If the IGF would have freed itself from its
> ITU-ECOSOC-UN-WSIS-father-in-law, and unilaterally proclaimed its
> independent standing,
>

I'm all for an independent IGF.



>  it could have already call for an international convention to define the
> Internet Polity requested by many. IGF, a spin-off of the WSIS? But only to
> the condition that IGF would be able to convene a real constituency, with
> its different parts clearly defined, each one in its role and limitation.
>

Ideally there should be no different parts.  Everyone comes together as
themselves, not as CS or Biz or gov or whatever artificial group has been
foisted on us by WSIS.


-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route
indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20131130/1129df9d/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t