[governance] High-Level Panel Organizes to Address Future of Internet Governance

[Suresh Ramasubramanian]

Keeping in mind that I do have reservations about this group - simply because I don't know as much about it as yet .. 

You say "the people selected don't include the most important names on internet governance evolution"

So - specific suggestions please.  Who do you think should not be there? And who should be there?   Or is this more a "why was I not selected to this panel" thing?

--srs (iPad)

> On 18-Nov-2013, at 7:36, Jeremy Malcolm <jeremy at ciroap.org> wrote:
> 
>> On 18/11/13 08:43, John Curran wrote:
>> A high-level panel has been organized to consider the issues surrounding global Internet cooperation - 
>> 
>> "The Panel plans to release a high-level report in early 2014 for public comment. The report will include principles for global Internet cooperation, proposed frameworks for such cooperation and a roadmap for future Internet governance challenges."
>> 
>> <http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/high-level-panel-organizes-to-address-future-of-internet-governance-232274461.html>
> 
> So it seems that ICANN has taken it upon itself to select the civil society representatives for the High Level Panel on the Future of Global Internet Cooperation, which is what became of its 5th panel on Internet evolution.  Previously Fadi had claimed that the fate of the 5th panel would be a decision for (what is now) the 1net dialogue, but evidently this was just more bluff.
> 
> The civil society representatives that ICANN helpful chose on our behalf do not include the most expert names on Internet governance evolution.  And meanwhile ISOC is "representing" civil society in other processes such as in the UNGA draft resolution on the right to privacy in the digital age.  The technical community, supported by its hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue, is eating broader civil society alive.
> 
> We are being completely left behind while we are dithering over questions about whether to send the letter nominating our representatives to the Brazil meeting, and whether our mailing list should be open or closed.  It is absolutely imperative now that we put internal process issues on hold, and focus on urgent substantive issues.
> 
> Will post something more practical about all this to the new (though now already mis-named) "summit" list.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Dr Jeremy Malcolm
> Senior Policy Officer
> Consumers International | the global campaigning voice for consumers
> Office for Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
> Lot 5-1 Wisma WIM, 7 Jalan Abang Haji Openg, TTDI, 60000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
> Tel: +60 3 7726 1599
> 
> Explore our new Resource Zone - the global consumer movement knowledge hub | http://www.consumersinternational.org/news-and-media/resource-zone
> 
> @Consumers_Int | www.consumersinternational.org | www.facebook.com/consumersinternational
> 
> Read our email confidentiality notice. Don't print this email unless necessary.
> 
> WARNING: This email has not been encrypted. You are strongly recommended to enable PGP or S/MIME encryption at your end. For instructions, see http://jere.my/l/8m.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20131118/91e9e8cc/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t