[governance] Industrial Progress, revisited…

[Carlos A. Afonso]

... and this is supposing we have absolutely clarified the meaning of 
bottoms-up... errr... bottom-up (since we are talking about BUTOC...), 
transparent, open and consensus.

--c.a.

On 05/19/2013 02:15 AM, Andrea Glorioso wrote:
> Thanks for. A few more questions to clarify.
>
> On May 19, 2013 1:18 AM, "McTim" <dogwallah at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Andrea Glorioso
>> <andrea at digitalpolicy.it> wrote:
>>>
>>> Who is the "we" here?
>>
>> Those of us who participate in the BUTOC (Bottom Up, Transparent,
>> Open, Consensus) based processes of IG.
>
> So is being BUTOC a necessary condition for a process to be
> multi-stakeholder? Is it also a sufficient condition?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andrea
>

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t