[governance] Workshop Proposals - a few days to go

[parminder]

Anriette

This is fine with me, as long as the facilitator leads a real purposeful 
dialogue, and we move towards codifying guidelines and processes.

BTW, I am not sue how enhanced cooperation (EC) falls within a dialogue 
on MS processes. I would think that MS processes should be discussed 
within EC talk. EC is about global public policy making, and it requires 
due multi stakeholder processes to be involved in the process.  That 
part is a bit odd.

parminder


On Tuesday 19 March 2013 12:49 PM, Anriette Esterhuysen wrote:
> Dear all
>
> Here is the description of the workshop I proposed. I have included and
> built on Nnenna's suggestions.
>
> Anriette
>
> Proposed title:
>
> "From lessons learnt to good practice: Strengthening accountability and
> transparency in MS processes"
>
> Such a workshop could be jointly convened by the three non-governmental stakeholder groups in the IGF and used
> to share experiences, raise concerns, and try and identify good practice approaches. We could also discuss the composition of these constituency
> groups, including ambiguity around the definitions of the TA community and the challenges that arise at times in CS from having a mix of
> organisational members and individual CS activists and analysts.
>
> The outcomes of discussion at the workshop could become an input to the CSTD WG on EC.
>
> The objectives of the workshop could be defined as follows (building on the remarks of Nnenna Nwakanma on the IGC list):
>
>
> 1. Highlight lessons learned from our involvement in multi-stakeholder
> processes
>
> 2. Explore what has worked or not worked in terms of how stakeholder
> groups are defined and represented
>
> 3. Build a common understanding on what would constitute sufficient
> transparency, openness and inclusion in such processes and discuss
> possible principles to work from
>
> 4. Propose working methods for going forward
>
> 4. Deepen the Enhanced Cooperation discussion and contribute a working
> document to the CSTD WG on EC.
>
>
> Discussion between the three groups could potentially begin in the build
> up to the IGF. There is certainly interest on the IGC list to initiate
> such discussion. We could also use the opportunity of the next IGF open
> consultation to have a face to face discussion.
>
>
>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20130319/51801a59/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t