[governance] Re: {S} International civil society letter to Congress to follow up from HRC statement

[Norbert Bollow]

Parminder <parminder at itforchange.net> wrote:

> We should certainly seek IGC endorsement. This is too important a
> matter for IGC to do nothing about - I mean if we are not
> contemplating our own statement...
> 
> Since there isnt much time to give endorsement, co- coordinators
> should initiate the call for possible endorsement right away...

The time window for endorsement is until Monday morning US time, so IMO
there's no need to proceed right away to the consensus call.

One alternative to just endorsing http://bestbits.net/prism-congress/
would be to endorse it and at the same time also endorse ISOC's
statement
http://www.internetsociety.org/news/internet-society-statement-importance-open-global-dialogue-regarding-online-privacy

Views on how IGC should proceed?

Greetings,
Norbert

> 
> On Friday 14 June 2013 03:48 PM, Norbert Bollow wrote:
> > As was mentioned before, the letter text is essentially fixed now,
> > and open to endorsements:
> >
> > http://bestbits.net/prism-congress/
> >
> > Should the coordinators take the relative silence to mean that
> > unlike in regard to the HTML5 issue, it is generally felt that in
> > this particular advocacy activity, an endorsement from the IGC is
> > not likely to help, and therefore we should not bother going
> > through the steps to make the decision for the Caucus to endorse
> > the statement (or not) ???
> >
> > Greetings,
> > Norbert
> >
> >
> > Norbert Bollow <nb at bollow.ch> wrote:
> >
> >> [with IGC coordinator hat on]
> >>
> >> There's ongoing work to create an international civil society
> >> letter to US Congress to follow up from the HRC statement.
> >>
> >> The BestBits list has been advertised as the primary locus for
> >> these discussions, http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
> >>
> >> The draft statement is at:
> >>
> >> http://igcaucus.org:9001/p/your_name_here
> >>
> >> (As far as the igcaucus.org pad server is concerned, it's a
> >> statement with the somewhat confusing name "your_name_here" -
> >> you're not actually supposed to put your name there.)
> >>
> >> The planned timeline is:
> >>
> >> 10amEST, Friday - Letter closed for edits, so Michael can proceed
> >> with final clean up
> >> 12:00EST, Friday - we need this letter to be in a site (Jeremy?)
> >> 12:30EST, Friday opens for signatures in the website
> >> Monday morning - deliver in DC (who will do this?)
> >>
> >> Is there interest for the IGC to endorse this?
> >>
> >> If by the time that the letter is finalized, there are several
> >> expressions of support and no objections, I'll issue a formal
> >> consensus call.
> >>
> >> Greetings,
> >> Norbert
> >>
> >
> 


-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t