[governance] Asking the U.S. government to allow Google to publish more national security request data
McTim
dogwallah at gmail.com
Wed Jun 12 13:20:43 EDT 2013
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:52 PM, parminder <parminder at itforchange.net> wrote:
>
> McTIm, what you are talking about is entirely a different matter, and
> nothing to do with PRISM which pried on actual content of non US ians
well to be precise, the NSA has been doing this for decades. PRISM
being a supposedly 20M USD program can do nothing of that sort.
... My
> email is clear abut this, isnt it
yes you said:
"I would like to see if they made any similar request to US gov before
Edward Snowden happened"
I showed you an article that described how this happened in March.
... Google's letter is also clear that it
> is about Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) requests. These
> requests all pertain to actual content of non US isans and that is not what
> you are talking about in your email)
again, to be precise, I sent two links and quoted from one...none of
the words in my previous email on this thread were mine.
.... Let Google show us any
> communication that made to the US gov regarding complying with these
I doubt they would publish these, as it may not be legal to do so, but
you have to ask them directly.
> requests. Or you on their behalf. That would be relevant. Of course Google
> watches spaces like these. if they have any such letter that would do a lot
> to save their face.... So, if they do not come out with such a letter(s)
> within a day or two, it is safe to assume that they never asked th US gov to
> allow them at least some degree of transparency on PRISM compliance
no, it is not safe to assume that at all.
.... In
> fact still no one, including Google, has told us how FISA requests were
> received and complied with.
here:
http://techcrunch.com/2013/06/08/cooperation-methods-protected-innocents-from-prism/
At least at this stage someone needs to tell us
> that.
You may want to know, but that doesn't mean "someone needs to tell us".
Google and others have simply denied they knew anything of the name
> PRISM, but they must certainly know FISA.
see link above.
We can talk about that. Let them
> not tell the number of requests if they are prohibited from telling the
> numbers. But let us know at least what is that we the non US users of Google
> are exposed. How does it work... Hos is it possibe for non US ians to trust
> Google and other involved companies after this.
see link above.
--
Cheers,
McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
For all other list information and functions, see:
http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
http://www.igcaucus.org/
Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
More information about the Governance
mailing list