[governance] Is 'tit for tat' all that can be accomplished?

[Nick Ashton-Hart]

Dear all,

Reading the governance list, I'm struck by how little discussion there is on how to take the things that you presumably agree on (objection to overbroad surveillance, etc.) and do something productive with it; it seems almost all effort is spent trying to score points against factions.

Is this really the best that this list can do?

Other lists - like Best Bits - are responding with statements and the like on topical subjects. Would you rather score points against one another, or score points for the public interest?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20130611/b0359833/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20130611/b0359833/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t