[governance] caucus contribution, consultation and MAG meeting

[Norbert Bollow]

Adam Peake <ajp at glocom.ac.jp> wrote:
> If the general concept's accepted then all kinds of things might
> happen over that middle "free" period.  Might be structured, or might
> not.  Some might pre-organize a workshop, might be your speed
> dialogue, might be just people sitting around a table at lunch and
> picking up on a question from the morning an running with it, might be
> structured breakout groups.  We've a lot of time to think about how to
> use the time and to warn about potential problems such as
> mono-stakeholder discussion, I just hope the  IGC and then the
> upcoming consultation agrees that trying something different is
> worthwhile.

Is the current draft text on
http://www.igcaucus.org/digressit/archives/79 acceptable from your
perspective?

Greetings,
Norbert

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t