[governance] caucus contribution, consultation and MAG meeting

[Norbert Bollow]

Adam Peake <ajp at glocom.ac.jp> wrote:

> How do you feel about devoting a day to a single subject and using
> mixed formats?
> 
> For example:
> 
> Morning: 2 hours of panel or round table ("experts" + a listening
> audience) Mid-day: Morning session closes with set of questions,
> challenges. Audience encouraged (as they wish) to join in small groups
> (self-organize) to discuss any/all issues raised.  Use social media to
> say where a group is, topics selected, language used, provide updates,
> etc etc.  4 hours including lunch.
> Afternoon: 2 hour plenary.  Groups come back to main hall and
> share/discuss (moderator act as facilitators,)
> 
> Rapporteurs might attempt to identify outcomes, report in to a session
> on the last afternoon. Rapporteurs might be a small multi-stakeholder
> team, or an individual.
> 
> Not wedded to any of above, but I think enhanced cooperation and
> Internet principles both merit much more time than a single typical
> format session can offer.

Is the text in paragraphs 6, 10 and 11 on
http://www.igcaucus.org/digressit/archives/79
adequate? If not, how should it be changed?

Greetings,
Norbert

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t