[governance] Re: caucus contribution -> proposed footnote on process

[Avri Doria]

looks good to me.

avri

On 13 Feb 2013, at 12:27, Norbert Bollow wrote:

> Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:
> 
>> On 13 Feb 2013, at 08:59, Norbert Bollow wrote:
> 
> ...
...

> Ok, since you insist :-)
> 
> I hereby propose a footnote to be added at the end of paragraph 1, with
> the following text: "These comments have been developed, in a bottom-up
> manner, using the following process: Using the mailing list and online
> working area of the Civil Society Internet Governance Caucus, comments
> were gathered and initial drafts for the statement were created in an
> informal manner. Following that, the statement has been formalized by
> means of a formal consensus process, during which the civil society
> representatives who are members of the caucus were able to raise issues
> about the draft statement, such as suggestions for additions, deletions
> and changes. These issues were then discussed with the goal of finding
> a phrasing that would be acceptable to all who participated in the
> discussion. Those points on which it was not possible to reach
> consensus were deleted from the draft statement. The result is a
> statement which therefore reflects the consensus of the Civil Society
> Internet Governance Caucus."
> 
> Greetings,
> Norbert
> 


-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t