[governance] caucus contribution -> recommendations of WG on IGF improvements

[Norbert Bollow]

I think it's pretty clear that we're not going to get consensus on how
binding / definitive the recommendations of WG on IGF improvements
should be taken to be.

I therefore propose that we develop a formulation that avoids taking a
position on that specific aspect, while communicating eagerness to see
those three specific recommendations implemented that we are citing.

Is that an acceptable path forward for the Caucus statement?

(Individual Caucus members would of course, independent of the Caucus
statement, be free make a written contribution of their own on whether
an additional consultative process is appropriate before the
recommendations of WG on IGF improvements are implemented.)

Greetings,
Norbert

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t