[governance] All power should be in the hands of the engineers? (was Re: HLLM in LOndon - CS reps)

[McTim]

On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Jean-Christophe Nothias
<jeanchristophe.nothias at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Georges,
>
> I do not think anyone has a problem with the Alejandro classification, nor himself. With his resume, his grade, his whatever. Nothing of these.
>
> The issue is about his statements during ICANN48. So let's talk about that. What does these statements mean to the CS

They are just one input that we can embrace or reject.  I think they
are quite reasonable (separating ICANN issues from surveillance,
rejecting a single definition of IG, pushing forward on evolution of
the unilateral role of the US).



, to the IG debate, its potential objectives and tangible results of a
2014-discussion.

If anything it pushes us forward to tangible results.

 Even though someone like Alejandro has put all these big words
(orders/advises) in his mouth, it is difficult to imagine that he did
it from his own initiative.

Now that is outrageous.  Why would you make such an uninformed
accusation?  You have zero basis for such a claim!


 All what he said is shocking to any honest participant to the IG debate.


There was nothing shocking there.  Are there any of us that accept the
WGIG definition as the ONLY definition of IG?


-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t