[IRPCoalition] [governance] Position by IT for Change and some other NGOs on enhanced cooperation

[JFC Morfin]

At 20:21 30/08/2013, Anja Kovacs wrote:
>Dear all,
>
>While the Internet Democracy Project is not a member of APC, and 
>though we do have differences of opinion with APC (e.g. on how 
>severe the threat of backgtracking on the Tunis agenda is), we 
>broadly agree with APC's views on the IT for Change statement as 
>outlined by Valeria. We will not be able to sign the IT for Change statement.
>
>It is oftentimes made to seem as if there are only two options where 
>Internet governance arrangements are concerned: the status quo and a 
>more centralised form of governance, the latter often (though not 
>always) imagined as involving greater government control. We believe 
>that there is a third way, and one that has far greater potential 
>for a politics of justice, which is that of distributed governance. 
>We will be submitting a submission to the WGEC along these lines.

Dear Anja,
from reading you I realize that I miss a "MuSHMap", the links and 
related positions in each category.
Does anyone knows if such reference frame exists?
jfc



-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t