[governance] WGEC: Questionnaire on internet governance

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

We each approach this in our own way.

I think I can do my job of representing the interests of the Civil Society submissions better by not having my own.  

You think otherwise.  

Cool.

One advantage of some positions coming with their own WGEC champions is I will feel less obligation to defend them since their primary defenders will be in place as members of the group already.  i figure one of my roles in the WGEC, at least in the early stages is to make sure that all CS positions that don't come with a WGEC champion get a fair hearing.

I respect your position, of course, as well.

avri


From: "Carlos A. Afonso" <ca at cafonso.ca>
> 
> 
> Dear Avri, I respect your position, of course.
> 
> My understanding is that we are in the WGEC (like some of us were in the
> WGIG) because we are expected to bring to the dialogue what we think are
> the views of the stakeholders we are supposed to represent, and I think
> the questionnaire is a good (although imperfect) instrument to help
> convey these views. So, even if WGEC members themselves decided to
> respond and provide their views, I would welcome it.
> 
> Thus, I do not agree we should exclude the organizations we are related
> to from this survey, and this is the position of several other
> participants who are helping to build institutional responses to the
> questionnaire.
> 
> fraternal regards


-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t