[governance] WGEC: Questionnaire on internet governance

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

Thanks Suresh.

I, personally, would not go so far as to say others should recuse themselves.  For myself, I would have felt I had to recuse myself in one place or another as part of the multistakeholder give and take, but that is just me.  

I want to feel free to discuss with enthusiasm once in the WGEC and to work for a true multistakeholder synthesis.  And in order to have that freedom, I needed to recuse myself from the creation of the comments.

I have also found that by listening to many discussions of what was to go into comments, without spending any time forming my own view has given me a chance to learn stuff about some other perspectives.  For me that is a key part of this multistakeholder activity - learning to understand other perspectives.

As an absolute relativist, I accept that mine is but one way of doing things.  
I even accept that my way may be a divergent outlier.

avri

On 29 Aug 2013, at 20:59, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:

> What avri is suggesting, I think, is that any wgec member's organization is welcome to submit a response but the specific wgec member should recuse him or herself from the drafting of that response so that they are able to evaluate it along with all the other responses, with an open mind. 
> 
> Fairly reasonable suggestion 
> 
> --srs (htc one x) 


-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t