[governance] Barack Obama Victory Tweet Most Retweeted Ever

[Suresh Ramasubramanian]

Don't get me wrong, I'd have voted for Obama if I were a US citizen

The one thing I have an issue with is that there's little or no
relationship between that (or other discussion about the US elections) and
internet governance.  Except in an abstract way as an illustration of the
USA's tradition of free speech, say.

This list has a fairly high level of traffic, so getting four or five news
articles, seemingly randomly chosen, forwarded to it every day doesn't help
much.

thanks 
srs

Charity Gamboa [07/11/12 23:00 -0600]:
>Suresh,
>
>It's always a matter of opinion. Anybody can hit the delete key if that
>particular item perplexes them. But you know some of us who can make the
>connection  - then it's not a big deal. The picture of the president and
>the first lady hugging and is heavily tweeted (and even circulated in
>Facebook) is a sign of free speech online.  Please don't get me wrong - you
>are entitled to ask. There are so many facebook pages created in the US
>that is devoted to political opinions, e.g. "*Politically Incorrect and
>Proud of It Too*." Anybody can subscribe to humorous quotes, posts and
>pictures that pokes fun at President Obama. That's like normal squabbling.
>You have the likes of Michelle Malkin who is a very strong conservative
>blogger who uses her Twitchy website to post her tweets (as screenshots) to
>make a political point. So those people who tweeted on Obama's winning are
>probably his supporters, thus, expressing their own right to express
>themselves via social media. I see nothing wrong with that regardless if
>one is a liberal, conservative or a libertarian. Do I really need to
>elaborate on this issue? Nope - it's a no brainer. I just want to point out
>that this is how I would think of the issue. But I wouldn't chide Fahd for
>posting that here as well as he is also is exercising his right to share
>his opinion. I also chose to give him a break.
>
>Charity Gamboa-Embley
>
>On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian <suresh at hserus.net>wrote:
>
>> Well you see, without some commentary about it in this context from the
>> original poster, it is practically impossible to tell the difference
>> between that and idle forwarding of random news articles.
>>
>> --srs (htc one x)
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Reply message -----
>> From: "Ivar A. M. Hartmann" <ivarhartmann at gmail.com>
>> To: "governance at lists.igcaucus.org" <governance at lists.igcaucus.org>,
>> "Suresh Ramasubramanian" <suresh at hserus.net>
>> Cc: "Fahd A. Batayneh" <fahd.batayneh at gmail.com>
>> Subject: [governance] Barack Obama Victory Tweet Most Retweeted Ever
>> Date: Thu, Nov 8, 2012 4:26 AM
>>
>>
>> I believe major happenings in the field of social networks are of interest
>> to IG.
>> In this case, it's more strong evidence of the use of social networks for
>> political speech. This relates to cyberdemocracy theories and concerns
>> stakeholders involved in regulating free speech online as political speech
>> is deemed in almost all democracies to be the type of speech that calls for
>> the stronger protection.
>> Just my opinion.
>> Best,
>> Ivar
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian <suresh at hserus.net
>> >wrote:
>>
>> > May I ask your opinion on how or why a photo of a couple hugging is
>> anyway
>> > remotely related to igov?
>> >
>> > --srs (iPad)
>> >
>> > On 08-Nov-2012, at 1:26, "Fahd A. Batayneh" <fahd.batayneh at gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-20237531
>> >
>> > The words "four more years", coupled with a photo of Barack and Michelle
>> > Obama embraced in a hug, have become the most retweeted Twitter post
>> ever.
>> >
>> > Fahd
>> >
>> > ____________________________________________________________
>> > You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>> >     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
>> > To be removed from the list, visit:
>> >     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>> >
>> > For all other list information and functions, see:
>> >      http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
>> > To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>> >     http://www.igcaucus.org/
>> >
>> > Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>> >
>> >
>> > ____________________________________________________________
>> > You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>> >      governance at lists.igcaucus.org
>> > To be removed from the list, visit:
>> >      http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>> >
>> > For all other list information and functions, see:
>> >      http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
>> > To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>> >      http://www.igcaucus.org/
>> >
>> > Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>> >
>> >
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>      governance at lists.igcaucus.org
>> To be removed from the list, visit:
>>      http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>>
>> For all other list information and functions, see:
>>      http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
>> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>>      http://www.igcaucus.org/
>>
>> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>>
>>

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t