[governance] CSTD Meeting on EC, Memo 3, Afternoon

[Oksana Prykhodko]

Dear Izumi,

Could you please check Ukraine's participation in this meeting?

I send official requests for information on this issue to our Ministry
of Foreign Affairs, but I did not receive any answer.

Thank you very much in advance,
Best regards,
Oksana

2012/5/18 Izumi AIZU <iza at anr.org>:
> Only governments are given floor, and may not have time for others to say
> anything. IF that happnes, very bad, and proves that CSTD is not the best
> place to continue this discussion.
>
> Anyway, please read the air here before we may be given the floor.
>
>
> ----
>
> 15:55
> Canada
> Heather
> on EC
> civil society, private sector, tech community contributions are vital
> improving inclusiveness
> strong participant of enhanced cooperation initiatives, including IGF,
> are necessary to progress
> capacity building a priority
>
> GAC – 135 members
>
> Ask the chair to give assurance to give sufficient time here to
> non-governmental members.
>
> Chair
> provided to translator until 6 pm
>
> Algeria
> We heard two contradictory messages,
> need for -many speakers voiced doubt
> Why prejudge UN – even it has not started!
> UN to look at such important matter as Internet Governance.
> This morning, a speaker of government took the position – his stance
> there is a new position, message – they are ready for the fight. Ready
> to enter into debate. We hope this is a new position and approach.
> Good news.
> Algeria is ready to debate, provide arguments, restructure the
> reorganization of the Internet.
> In 2004, there were too innovative in that climate, but now we are
> ready in the light of all the changes that occurred recently.
> We are in favor of the need to give each and everyone the place that
> befalls him, the Internet Governance.
>
> Ambassador of India
> Internet is a living entity, expanding and evolving continuously
> EC process has to be brought to various fora including IBSA at EC
> consultation in Nov 2010 and CSTD, ECOSOC and UN GA.
> There are many cross-cutting policy issues, privacy, piracy, etc.
> India made a proposal to setup a Committee on Internet Related
> Policies in line with Tunis agenda.
> India will be pragmatic and flexible in this approach.
>
> Iran
> Question - Composition of the panel this morning
> Why there was no one from the government on the panel?
> At the end of Wsis negotiation process, facing the dilemma how to
> reach consensus – two parallel – one is IGF and another is EC.
> ask for the unfulfilled part of the Tunis mandate.
> IGF is lucky enough and flourished, congratulate it, will try to
> contribute to its success.
> But the second one has not been fulfilled.
> After the review on the desirability of continuation of IGF
>  one is Improvement,
>  second one – to provide new demand and momentum for EC, neglected
> fulfill the mandate, it’s negotiation, not forum
> So our proposal is to create a inter-governmental mechanism in UN, to
> fulfil the mandate to negotiate at appropriate level
> as speedy as possible, af
>
> Chair
> the government to chose one was difficult
>
> Belgium
> implementation efforts should be enhanced within existing institutions in MSH
>
> Sudan Minister
> need for the respect of freedom in searching and requiring, collecting
> and disseminating information – further stated in UDHR
> difficulty in downloading open source material, not able to obtain
> Window or other MS license
> urge all stakeholder, to reaffirm the right of individuals
> Domain names – two paras be reflected
> ICANN is owned by USG
> it be government owned
>  Arabic domain name- not able to achieve yet
>
> Switzerland
> Thomas
> spending hours of repeating these two divergent views, not coming closer
> consultations in 2012, missed the opportunity
> it does not make sense to continue this much longer
> try to agree on next step to Enhanced Cooperation
> Swiss – compromise, to hold interactive multi-stakeholder consultation
> EC is started or not does not matter in our opinion
> We plea to all stakeholders for the next step.
>
> We plea to all stakeholders for the next step.
>
> on IGF, urge governments and others to seriously consider the MSH
> funding in MSH process.
>
> support Canada’s urge to give the floor to non-gov members.
>
> <Applause>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t