[governance] CSTD Meeting on EC, Memo 3, Afternoon

[Izumi AIZU]

Hi,

I do not have access to the participants info, and I have not seen anyone
representing Ukraine in the room. I will ask the secretariat.

izumi

2012/5/19 Oksana Prykhodko <sana.pryhod at gmail.com>:
> Dear Izumi,
>
> Could you please check Ukraine's participation in this meeting?
>
> I send official requests for information on this issue to our Ministry
> of Foreign Affairs, but I did not receive any answer.
>
> Thank you very much in advance,
> Best regards,
> Oksana
>
> 2012/5/18 Izumi AIZU <iza at anr.org>:
>> Only governments are given floor, and may not have time for others to say
>> anything. IF that happnes, very bad, and proves that CSTD is not the best
>> place to continue this discussion.
>>
>> Anyway, please read the air here before we may be given the floor.
>>
>>
>> ----
>>
>> 15:55
>> Canada
>> Heather
>> on EC
>> civil society, private sector, tech community contributions are vital
>> improving inclusiveness
>> strong participant of enhanced cooperation initiatives, including IGF,
>> are necessary to progress
>> capacity building a priority
>>
>> GAC – 135 members
>>
>> Ask the chair to give assurance to give sufficient time here to
>> non-governmental members.
>>
>> Chair
>> provided to translator until 6 pm
>>
>> Algeria
>> We heard two contradictory messages,
>> need for -many speakers voiced doubt
>> Why prejudge UN – even it has not started!
>> UN to look at such important matter as Internet Governance.
>> This morning, a speaker of government took the position – his stance
>> there is a new position, message – they are ready for the fight. Ready
>> to enter into debate. We hope this is a new position and approach.
>> Good news.
>> Algeria is ready to debate, provide arguments, restructure the
>> reorganization of the Internet.
>> In 2004, there were too innovative in that climate, but now we are
>> ready in the light of all the changes that occurred recently.
>> We are in favor of the need to give each and everyone the place that
>> befalls him, the Internet Governance.
>>
>> Ambassador of India
>> Internet is a living entity, expanding and evolving continuously
>> EC process has to be brought to various fora including IBSA at EC
>> consultation in Nov 2010 and CSTD, ECOSOC and UN GA.
>> There are many cross-cutting policy issues, privacy, piracy, etc.
>> India made a proposal to setup a Committee on Internet Related
>> Policies in line with Tunis agenda.
>> India will be pragmatic and flexible in this approach.
>>
>> Iran
>> Question - Composition of the panel this morning
>> Why there was no one from the government on the panel?
>> At the end of Wsis negotiation process, facing the dilemma how to
>> reach consensus – two parallel – one is IGF and another is EC.
>> ask for the unfulfilled part of the Tunis mandate.
>> IGF is lucky enough and flourished, congratulate it, will try to
>> contribute to its success.
>> But the second one has not been fulfilled.
>> After the review on the desirability of continuation of IGF
>>  one is Improvement,
>>  second one – to provide new demand and momentum for EC, neglected
>> fulfill the mandate, it’s negotiation, not forum
>> So our proposal is to create a inter-governmental mechanism in UN, to
>> fulfil the mandate to negotiate at appropriate level
>> as speedy as possible, af
>>
>> Chair
>> the government to chose one was difficult
>>
>> Belgium
>> implementation efforts should be enhanced within existing institutions in MSH
>>
>> Sudan Minister
>> need for the respect of freedom in searching and requiring, collecting
>> and disseminating information – further stated in UDHR
>> difficulty in downloading open source material, not able to obtain
>> Window or other MS license
>> urge all stakeholder, to reaffirm the right of individuals
>> Domain names – two paras be reflected
>> ICANN is owned by USG
>> it be government owned
>>  Arabic domain name- not able to achieve yet
>>
>> Switzerland
>> Thomas
>> spending hours of repeating these two divergent views, not coming closer
>> consultations in 2012, missed the opportunity
>> it does not make sense to continue this much longer
>> try to agree on next step to Enhanced Cooperation
>> Swiss – compromise, to hold interactive multi-stakeholder consultation
>> EC is started or not does not matter in our opinion
>> We plea to all stakeholders for the next step.
>>
>> We plea to all stakeholders for the next step.
>>
>> on IGF, urge governments and others to seriously consider the MSH
>> funding in MSH process.
>>
>> support Canada’s urge to give the floor to non-gov members.
>>
>> <Applause>
>>
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
>> To be removed from the list, visit:
>>     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>>
>> For all other list information and functions, see:
>>     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
>> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>>     http://www.igcaucus.org/
>>
>> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>>
>



-- 
                     >> Izumi Aizu <<
Institute for InfoSocionomics, Tama University, Tokyo
Institute for HyperNetwork Society, Oita,
Japan
www.anr.org

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t