[governance] "Oversight"

[parminder]

On Thursday 14 June 2012 09:35 PM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
>
>
> None of the above.
>
> 1. Abolish the GAC.
>

Yes, I agree.

> 2. Develop a legal agreement formalizing ICANN's accountability, 
> limiting its powers, and limiting the powers of governments over it. 
> Let govts ratify that treaty.
>

Right. I agree. But you say this, and very often slip away. If you are 
proposing a model , it has to have a basic solidity (even if, 'under the 
circumstances' kind)

> 3. If you don't like the second step,
>
then complete the transition of ICANN to fully private status and define 
a membership status that makes it truly accountable.



So, here you  slip away again :). Well still. Since you are the one who 
is proposing the model, can you yourself propose, what kind of 
membership and membership status, under what statutes, how does the 
whole thing operate, and how and to whom issues/ grievances are 
escalated if needed.


parminder


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20120615/7a035fdb/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t