[governance] Day 2 of CSTD IGF WG

Imran Ahmed Shah ias_pk at yahoo.com
Tue Feb 21 07:30:58 EST 2012


That is excellent Marilia, we will be happy to see the practicle implementation of such support.
Last year, IGF2011, here three Remote Hubs were arranged at Universties.
http://igfpak.org/?page_id=37
 
Thanks
Imran Ahmed Shah
 

>________________________________
> From: Marilia Maciel <mariliamaciel at gmail.com>
>To: governance at lists.igcaucus.org; Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro <salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com> 
>Cc: Izumi AIZU <iza at anr.org> 
>Sent: Tuesday, 21 February 2012, 17:02
>Subject: Re: [governance] Day 2 of CSTD IGF WG
>  
>
>On the topic of funding I mentioned remote participation. My suggestion was that:
>
>
>"There should be stable and predictable funding to cover remote participation management and technical expenses in order to avoid relying solely on voluntary work. The Secretariat and the host country should work together to ensure the availability of adequate technical and human resources, including remote moderator".  Stable and apropriate funding need to be available for RP to work. Part of the reason why quality of remote participation is variable from year to year is that funding is also unreliable and variable. Remote participation has become so important it should not depend of the availability of volunteers. 
>
>
>Difficult to get through with the topic though.
>
>
>Marília
>
>On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro <salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>Dear All,
>>
>>You can also follow the live tweets #CSTDWG. Some of our members are tweeting.
>>
>>Warm Regards,
>>Sala
>>
>>
>>On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Izumi AIZU <iza at anr.org> wrote:
>>
>>Day 2 of CSTD IGF Working Group started at 10:10. The Chair wanted to
>>>start sharp on
>>>10:00 yesterday.
>>>
>>>We are continuing on the remaining discussion on Point B, Working
>>>modalities including open consultations, MAG, and Secretariat.
>>>
>>>We almost reached the consensus of MAG selection, not establish new
>>>Trusted group or Selection committee, but preserve the current
>>>practice, three stakeholder groups make nominations, and SG will
>>>select - with emphasis on diversity etc.
>>>
>>>Additional suggestion to define MAG's  Terms of Reference was also dropped.
>>>
>>>Then we discussed about the IGF Secretariat, and the argument was
>>>around "independence".
>>>Final wording agreed was, "independent of any stakeholder group's
>>>interest" - something like that.
>>>Other editorial and other points were also discussed.
>>>
>>>We finished Point B now, (at 12:15 pm), and moving to Point. C,
>>>Funding, the most contentious
>>>part.
>>>
>>>izumi
>>>
>>>
>>>____________________________________________________________
>>>You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>>    governance at lists.igcaucus.org
>>>To be removed from the list, visit:
>>>    http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>>>
>>>For all other list information and functions, see:
>>>    http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
>>>To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>>>    http://www.igcaucus.org/
>>>
>>>Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>-- 
>>
>>Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala
>>
>>
>>Tweeter: @SalanietaT
>>Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro 
>>Cell: +679 998 2851
>> 
>>
>>
>>
>>____________________________________________________________
>>You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>    governance at lists.igcaucus.org
>>To be removed from the list, visit:
>>    http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>>
>>For all other list information and functions, see:
>>    http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
>>To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>>    http://www.igcaucus.org/
>>
>>Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>>
>>
>
>
>
>-- 
>Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade
>FGV Direito Rio
>
>Center for Technology and Society
>Getulio Vargas Foundation
>Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
> 
>____________________________________________________________
>You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>    governance at lists.igcaucus.org
>To be removed from the list, visit:
>    http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
>For all other list information and functions, see:
>    http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
>To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>    http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
>Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
>
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20120221/99e6ea3f/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t


More information about the Governance mailing list