[governance] new gTLDs

[McTim]

On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Carlos A. Afonso <ca at cafonso.ca> wrote:

> I assume McTim has already analyzed ownership relations of all domain
> name proponents?


You are mixing apples and oranges.  I identified the public interest being
served by allowing more gTLDs.





> I would not dare to assume anything before doing this.
> In my view as far as I can see (who "owns", who operates etc), the big
> domain companies will keep most of the pie.
>


Would you serve a greater public interest by denying orgs the ability to
apply for the name they want because they may be large/corporate/rich/US
orgs?


-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route
indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20120817/24059361/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t