[governance] New MAG announced

[Roland Perry]

In message <245B2132-7389-46D0-8B02-860745B635E3 at hellmonds.eu>, at 
14:22:58 on Sat, 28 Apr 2012, Peter H. Hellmonds 
<peter.hellmonds at hellmonds.eu> writes
>MAG members are free and encouraged to provide information to their 
>stakeholder groups, as long as they respect Charham House rules which 
>say you should not attribute anything specific to a particular person.
>
>But one could say, for example, that issue X has been contentious 
>between gov and civ soc for this or that reason. That a few proponents 
>were in favor of solution Y but were opposed by a small number who 
>favored Z.

That's certainly the case for the formal meetings (although now 
observers are allowed, it's harder to keep the Chatham House aspect 
going).

What I haven't seen much evidence of is MAG members (eg) bringing their 
stakeholder group's input into discussions of the "traffic light" rating 
selection of workshops, or keeping them up to date with news from the 
mailing list.

For example, have any (would any/should any) MAG members broken the news 
"early" that the Baku Forum has been moved to the Expo Centre - surely 
they were the first to know?
-- 
Roland Perry

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t